Ten years after the worst industrial air pollution disaster in Victoria’s history, Latrobe Valley locals and environmental lawyers say toxic coal mines still pose a risk to the Gippsland community.
On the anniversary of the Hazelwood mine fire, Latrobe Valley locals are calling on the
Victorian government to finally release reports on alternative mine rehabilitation options.
Engie plans to turn the former mine site into a full toxic pit lake, but no analysis has been released on alternatives, which include using recycled or desalinated water, or a partial pit-lake.
The Hazelwood mine fire began on 9 February 2014, blanketing the Latrobe Valley in toxic smoke and falling ash. It was declared safe 45 days later on 25 March 2014.
An inquiry found authorities were too slow in providing health advice to the community, the failure to appropriately manage and progressively rehabilitate the mine contributed to the fire’s severity, and the health of Morwell residents should be monitored for at least two decades.
Hundreds of community members are expected to attend the life after coal event on Saturday 17 February 2024 at Kernot Hall.
Water needs
Hazelwood mine is bigger than Melbourne CBD and cleaning it up will be the largest rehabilitation project Victoria has ever seen.
In total, more than 2,350 gigalitres (GL) of water will be needed to flood the Latrobe Valley's three mines.
Locals are worried that plans to use fresh and groundwater supplies to rehabilitate the Latrobe Valley's three mines risk the future of the Latrobe River system in a drying climate and will cause costly ground subsidence.
Engie’s plan to flood the mine will take almost two decades and more water than all of Sydney
Harbour – 637 GL – plus another five to 10 GL of water every year just to offset the evaporation.
This is in addition to the 630GL of water that EnergyAustralia needs to flood Yallourn (which is
closing in 2028). AGL will also need 1087 GL of water to rehabilitate Loy Yang, which is due to close in 2035.
How is water currently being used?
Locals have told us they're worried that the mine is progressively being filled with runoff from sprinklers, before the environmental impacts of the proposal have been assessed.
Of course, Engie needs to reduce the fire risk, but they also need to make sure they're complying with commonwealth environment laws and keeping the community informed.
It's difficult to get answers on the volume of water in the mine pit, but we do know the sprinklers are on around the clock.
The community doesn't want Engie to take short cuts on the rehabilitation and they want the regulator to make sure water is being used appropriately.